Mar 11, 2010









 • DOWNLOAD | KATEY RED “Sissy Clap” 2009
Vanity Fair wrote about the New Orleans “Sissy Bounce” scene this morning and I have been out-of-my-mind obsessed ever since. Urban gay subcultural moments like these have historically become either isolated to their respective corners (as in the underground ball scene) or decentralized from their gay roots (as in the heterosexualization of disco), but part of what makes Bounce so exciting is the fact that straight club-goers in New Orleans and elsewhere are openly championing the music — and regardless of how gay you thought the Village People were, you’d have an impossible time heterosexualizing this.
Katey Red — a transgendered woman and former prostitute who is essentially a godmother of the sound — describes the beginning of the Sissy Bounce scene as we know it:

Katey, who is 6’2” and performs — and looks damn good — in short skirts and heels, was the first of the openly gay M.C.s to get on the mic and get recognized, back in ‘98 at a hall near the infamous Melpomene housing projects, where she grew up. “At first, I was a bit scared,” Katey said of performing. “I know a lot of the boys listening didn’t like homosexuals. But I got over my fright. And they liked my music so much, they was like, Fuck it.”

Think about this for a second: a transgendered woman decided she was going to become a rap star in front of young men that looked like this — and she actually did it. Things done changed in the hood, people.


DOWNLOAD | KATEY RED “Sissy Clap” 2009

Vanity Fair wrote about the New Orleans “Sissy Bounce” scene this morning and I have been out-of-my-mind obsessed ever since. Urban gay subcultural moments like these have historically become either isolated to their respective corners (as in the underground ball scene) or decentralized from their gay roots (as in the heterosexualization of disco), but part of what makes Bounce so exciting is the fact that straight club-goers in New Orleans and elsewhere are openly championing the music — and regardless of how gay you thought the Village People were, you’d have an impossible time heterosexualizing this.

Katey Red — a transgendered woman and former prostitute who is essentially a godmother of the sound — describes the beginning of the Sissy Bounce scene as we know it:

Katey, who is 6’2” and performs — and looks damn good — in short skirts and heels, was the first of the openly gay M.C.s to get on the mic and get recognized, back in ‘98 at a hall near the infamous Melpomene housing projects, where she grew up. “At first, I was a bit scared,” Katey said of performing. “I know a lot of the boys listening didn’t like homosexuals. But I got over my fright. And they liked my music so much, they was like, Fuck it.”

Think about this for a second: a transgendered woman decided she was going to become a rap star in front of young men that looked like this — and she actually did it. Things done changed in the hood, people.

Notes
Mar 10, 2010

The Triumph of the Id

I know I like to use old school rock critics as occasional punching bags — as if I’m a dude in my 20s who loves Vivian Girls or something — but every now and then one of them writes something that totally shuts me up. Robert Christgau’s latest essay on Lil Wayne is so perfectly illuminating, and even charmingly self-deprecating, that it was nearly impossible to pick one quote. So I’m going with this one because it’s something I really never considered:

As even casual observers are dimly aware, Lil Wayne acquired three luxury residences, three babymamas, double-platinum certification, untold blunts, and the attention of many police departments by recording every day and giving the results away.

Which is totally true: Wayne became a human Napster and made FREE a sustainable business model. If the music industry really wanted to save itself, record executives would be drinking cough syrup right now.

Notes
Mar 9, 2010

This video has been reblogged literally almost 700 times as I write this, but I honestly believe this cannot be overblogged. A (ridiculously cute) kid named Calen meets a married gay couple for the very first time and, in only one minute, manages to figure out what millions of adults in America can’t seem to understand about when husbands marry husbands: “So that means you love each other!”

It’s really not as complicated as some people think. (via)

Notes
Mar 8, 2010

joledo asked: If you'll allow me to be a pseudo-fanboy and ask a tour related question:

Everybody that tours, has toured, or just travels for a living seems to have their favorite city to pull up to. Some because of it's history, others because of the view, and then those because of a sports team, record store, or favorite restaurant away from home.

What was your favorite place in the States/Canada to tour through and why?

I know this seems like a silly subject, but I haven't done nearly the extensive touring as you have and I always feel like I could have a 2nd job as a tour guide to most North American cities.

The thing I hate about touring is that it totally messed up my relationship with travel in general — meaning that, even when I’m on vacation now, it still feels like I’m going to work. That’s somewhat problematic for me when I’m trying to relax.

Your experience with touring, however, sounds like a much different thing. I’m wagering this because I’m pretty sure I could never be a “tour guide” for any city in which I’ve only been a recurring transient visitor, if only because the sites that I’m most familiar with — vegetarian food options, coffee shops, record stores — are not super interesting tour-guide material unless you have exactly three hours to enjoy a city before soundcheck and you’re confined to a one-mile radius of a random nightclub. (Also, random nightclubs in America are very rarely zoned in neighborhoods worth exploring.) So ultimately, I feel like a fraud whenever I tell people that I’m, quote-unquote, well-traveled.

Just last night I went to dinner with a Viennese couple. Because they seemed to light up when I mentioned that I’d actually been to Austria, I felt compelled to elaborate on the point so as not to feel like a liar.

“Technically, I was only there for a day and a half,” I said. “But I didn’t really get to see much before I ran into a pack of white power skinheads on the street and decided to head back inside.” Vienna, in fact, later earned the distinction of becoming the only city in the world where my job description included dodging glass bottles while playing guitar, but I left that out of my amendment because, really, that could have happened anywhere.

So when I think about America, it’s hard to consider my feelings about a particular city without losing the plot to this kind of collected mental detritus. Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for example, could very well be a perfectly fantastic place, but I’ll always remember it as the place where a local man told me — assuming that I was white? maybe it was dark out? — that black people ruined the entire city. Minneapolis will always be the city where we played a five-dollar basement show in a snowstorm even though First Avenue offered us a grip to play a “real” show. Champaign, Illinois, will always be the place we were scheduled to play with the Apples in Stereo until two planes flew into the World Trade Center that morning. And so on.

It’s interesting because, as I write this, I’m realizing that I probably couldn’t even point out Winston-Salem on a map — much less tell you what to do there — and in the end, I think that sort of psychophysical disconnect really sums up what I’m trying to say about the American city and my life as a nomad: It doesn’t feel particularly awesome to say it, but while my feet have touched the ground of hundreds of cities, my head was often somewhere else.

Notes
Mar 6, 2010
Here is, perhaps, the latest case of intellectual property theft: Last week on Saturday Night Live, Jennifer Lopez unveiled the first two songs from her forthcoming album, Love? — which was dropped by Epic/Sony last month and will find a new home, presumably, soon. Tucked away in the set design, Lopez was flanked by a logo that we can only assume intended to set up the visual identity for her new record: On the kickdrum and elsewhere, a heart merged with a question mark.
If it looked familiar to many of us, that’s probably because it is. My friend and former bandmate, Jonah Matranga, has been using this symbol for years. It’s found its way onto albums, posters, T-shirts, and stickers; he has it tattooed on his body. In other words, Jonah’s use of the design is well established, whereas J-Lo’s appropriation of the logo is — well, not so much. So he’s putting out a call:

I’ve been told that you can help out by sending photos of ways you’ve used the image in your life, after you found it through my music. So, if you have a tattoo of it, or you’ve made drawings of it, or you have anything at all that shows the many ways the little heart-question has gotten out there, I’d love to see it, and so would the lawyers. You can post your pics (or links to them) here, or send them via any number of internetty ways, or just mail ‘em to me.
I have no idea what will happen from all this, but it seems as good an excuse as any to gather this stuff together and remember the power and fun of making stuff and putting it out into the world.

Also, the new songs she played kinda sucked. But that’s neither here nor there.

Here is, perhaps, the latest case of intellectual property theft: Last week on Saturday Night Live, Jennifer Lopez unveiled the first two songs from her forthcoming album, Love?which was dropped by Epic/Sony last month and will find a new home, presumably, soon. Tucked away in the set design, Lopez was flanked by a logo that we can only assume intended to set up the visual identity for her new record: On the kickdrum and elsewhere, a heart merged with a question mark.

If it looked familiar to many of us, that’s probably because it is. My friend and former bandmate, Jonah Matranga, has been using this symbol for years. It’s found its way onto albums, posters, T-shirts, and stickers; he has it tattooed on his body. In other words, Jonah’s use of the design is well established, whereas J-Lo’s appropriation of the logo is — well, not so much. So he’s putting out a call:

I’ve been told that you can help out by sending photos of ways you’ve used the image in your life, after you found it through my music. So, if you have a tattoo of it, or you’ve made drawings of it, or you have anything at all that shows the many ways the little heart-question has gotten out there, I’d love to see it, and so would the lawyers. You can post your pics (or links to them) here, or send them via any number of internetty ways, or just mail ‘em to me.

I have no idea what will happen from all this, but it seems as good an excuse as any to gather this stuff together and remember the power and fun of making stuff and putting it out into the world.

Also, the new songs she played kinda sucked. But that’s neither here nor there.

Notes
Mar 3, 2010
GPOYW: Things Were So Much Simpler Then Edition. This is me, roughly sixteen years ago, standing in front of ABC-No-Rio when you could still buy heroin from dudes on the corner whispering, “Black death!” into your ear on the Lower East Side. Because it was 1994, I was wearing a backpack, a red windbreaker with the Embrace album cover silkscreened on the back, and a winter cap — even though it was probably spring. (On my feet, most likely, was a pair of canvas Israeli military shoes that my friends and I were kind of obsessed with at the time. We called them “Vegan Warriors.”) I was 20 years old, I made a living by publishing a fanzine, and my rent to live in Manhattan was $300 a month. Salad fucking days, people.
Photo: Brian Maryansky

GPOYW: Things Were So Much Simpler Then Edition. This is me, roughly sixteen years ago, standing in front of ABC-No-Rio when you could still buy heroin from dudes on the corner whispering, “Black death!” into your ear on the Lower East Side. Because it was 1994, I was wearing a backpack, a red windbreaker with the Embrace album cover silkscreened on the back, and a winter cap — even though it was probably spring. (On my feet, most likely, was a pair of canvas Israeli military shoes that my friends and I were kind of obsessed with at the time. We called them “Vegan Warriors.”) I was 20 years old, I made a living by publishing a fanzine, and my rent to live in Manhattan was $300 a month. Salad fucking days, people.

Photo: Brian Maryansky

Notes
Mar 2, 2010

Varg Vikernes to Donate Burzum Album Proceeds to Haiti

The headline alone kind of makes my head explode, but it’s true. It also inspired me to do some googling, where I inadvertently wound up on this fake Wiki page for Euronymous — the fellow black-metaller that Varg went to jail for murdering. Among the funnier excerpts is a description of “Necrospace” — “a sort of ‘black Myspace’ where lonely black metal artists and fans could chat and swap information about their favourite type of music” — and this description of the pair’s falling out:

Feeling lonely, Varg decided to go home and watch cartoons on TV. But as he walked away from Euronymous’ house, he turned back and saw the curtains of his friend’s bedroom twitch. Euronymous had been in all along, and was just avoiding him! That evening, Varg signed on to Necrospace, and found Euronymous on the chatroom. At first, Euronymous wouldn’t tell him what was going on, but eventually it all came out. After Varg had left on the night they burnt the church, Euronymous had discovered that some of his Pokemons were missing. Not just any Pokemons either — his favourite ones. Varg tried in vain to convince him that he hadn’t taken them, and anyway, he already had those ones, so why would he steal them? But it was no good. Euronymous had made up his mind that Varg was a thief, and he had convinced everyone else on Necrospace that this was the case. Varg signed out of the chat and cried himself to sleep.

I still love you, Internet.

Notes
Mar 2, 2010









 • DOWNLOAD | THE FINN BROTHERS “Anything Can Happen” Everyone is Here, 2004
Think about the last time something bad happened to you. Without even thinking about it, I can tell you that your friends and family said at least one of the following three things:

“It was meant to be.”
“Everything happens for a reason.”
“I guess it’s your karma.”

Now think about the last time that something good happened to you. Without even thinking about it, I can tell you that your friends and family said at least one of the following three things:

“It was meant to be!”
“I told you everything happens for a reason!”
“You deserve it; it’s your karma!”

I really hope that I’m not the first person to tell you this, but somebody needs to spread the word: It was not meant to be, everything doesn’t happen for a reason, and there is no such thing as providence or intellect when it comes to cause-and-effect. These are only expressions that we use because, for some odd reason, we are obsessed with finding explanations for the way things happen in the world — even where there are none. We pass these stock phrases for insight, when in reality the truth is less sexy: There is no grand design waiting for you to fulfill your invented destiny. It’s probably better that you get used to this idea now.
Last month, while working with some young people here in New York, a high school senior very casually mentioned that she’d probably be dropping out of school soon. “It’s my destiny,” she said.
I looked at her cross-eyed. “How is that your destiny?”
“Well,” she explained, as if she’d done so a million times before, “both my parents are dropouts, so it was kind of just meant to be.”
That’s not true, I told her. There is no such thing as a predetermined end in life, and even when it seems that way, what you do still makes a difference. Your parents are influential, but they are not necessarily instrumental in the path that you choose to take. “What you are calling destiny,” I argued, “is more of a self-fulfilling prophecy.”
In the end, she seemed to have a revelation. “I have power in this,” she said. And I agreed.
But last week I discovered that this student dropped out of high school, and it’s been bothering me ever since. She relinquished her power to the dominant American fiction that we perpetuate every day, and honestly, right now I’m kind of angry at everyone who has ever lent their voice to inflate the power of this myth — the idea that we all submit to an irrevocable fate. There is simply no way that I can encourage young people to actively engage with their ambitions if the rest of the world is simultaneously sending the message that we have no control over our lives. It’s a terrible lie, and it needs to stop.
Photo: Lyam


DOWNLOAD | THE FINN BROTHERS “Anything Can Happen” Everyone is Here, 2004

Think about the last time something bad happened to you. Without even thinking about it, I can tell you that your friends and family said at least one of the following three things:

  • “It was meant to be.”
  • “Everything happens for a reason.”
  • “I guess it’s your karma.”

Now think about the last time that something good happened to you. Without even thinking about it, I can tell you that your friends and family said at least one of the following three things:

  • “It was meant to be!”
  • “I told you everything happens for a reason!”
  • “You deserve it; it’s your karma!”

I really hope that I’m not the first person to tell you this, but somebody needs to spread the word: It was not meant to be, everything doesn’t happen for a reason, and there is no such thing as providence or intellect when it comes to cause-and-effect. These are only expressions that we use because, for some odd reason, we are obsessed with finding explanations for the way things happen in the world — even where there are none. We pass these stock phrases for insight, when in reality the truth is less sexy: There is no grand design waiting for you to fulfill your invented destiny. It’s probably better that you get used to this idea now.

Last month, while working with some young people here in New York, a high school senior very casually mentioned that she’d probably be dropping out of school soon. “It’s my destiny,” she said.

I looked at her cross-eyed. “How is that your destiny?”

“Well,” she explained, as if she’d done so a million times before, “both my parents are dropouts, so it was kind of just meant to be.”

That’s not true, I told her. There is no such thing as a predetermined end in life, and even when it seems that way, what you do still makes a difference. Your parents are influential, but they are not necessarily instrumental in the path that you choose to take. “What you are calling destiny,” I argued, “is more of a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

In the end, she seemed to have a revelation. “I have power in this,” she said. And I agreed.

But last week I discovered that this student dropped out of high school, and it’s been bothering me ever since. She relinquished her power to the dominant American fiction that we perpetuate every day, and honestly, right now I’m kind of angry at everyone who has ever lent their voice to inflate the power of this myth — the idea that we all submit to an irrevocable fate. There is simply no way that I can encourage young people to actively engage with their ambitions if the rest of the world is simultaneously sending the message that we have no control over our lives. It’s a terrible lie, and it needs to stop.

Photo: Lyam

Notes
Feb 26, 2010









• DOWNLOAD | TRAVIS “Colder” The Boy With No Name, 2007
This is the view outside my window as of three minutes ago. I saw the snow-covered trees and said out loud, “That’s beautiful.” Then I ran to the other side of the apartment, grabbed my camera, and preserved the image. With condolences to beach-loving folks everywhere, I can assure you that would never have happened in the summer.


DOWNLOAD | TRAVIS “Colder” The Boy With No Name, 2007

This is the view outside my window as of three minutes ago. I saw the snow-covered trees and said out loud, “That’s beautiful.” Then I ran to the other side of the apartment, grabbed my camera, and preserved the image. With condolences to beach-loving folks everywhere, I can assure you that would never have happened in the summer.

Notes
Feb 25, 2010
“Whispery posts” are de rigueur, but I’m gonna call this a “real talk post” because — real talk now — it bothers me that a blogger, of all people, thinks it’s OK to call another blogger that he’s never met a “touchy self-centered prick” over a post that was not nearly as touchy and self-centered and pricky as the response it received. It was like, “Hey, Pot. What do you think of Kettle?”
You’ll notice I’m not posting links to any of the offending posts, and that’s deliberate. I didn’t really sit down to write about a Tumblr feud that doesn’t even involve me because these isolated things blow over and they’re totally unimportant in the Big Picture™. It’s just that reading Pot’s digs at Kettle gave me some pangs of discomfort over the way we talk to each other on the Internet — depersonalizing one another with the artificial separation between “online” and “IRL” — and as someone who has spent most of his adult life trying to write as a means to connect with other human beings, it makes me sad to think that some so-called writers are trying to disconnect and then burn every bridge around them.
It reminded me of that time in 1993, when I was a nineteen-year-old kid with a fanzine, and I decided to trash a band I didn’t really know as a means of entertaining myself. I thought I was being “clever” — which, I guess, is what we called “snark” in the early ’90s. Anyway, the issue had barely come back from the printers before I regretted it. Unlike Pot, it didn’t take long before I realized that my response was way overdetermined, not as clever as I thought it was, and arguably unnecessary. My own Kettles didn’t deserve it.
So I learned my lesson seventeen years ago, and even though I’m admittedly into being the center of attention — you pretty much have to be to do anything in my lines of work — I try to achieve that regularly without being a dick. In his rebuttal post, of course, Pot accuses Kettle of wanting attention, and charitably adds, “I am completely willing to give you attention; I lose nothing by it except the followers who hate long posts.” But this is not totally true: I was a follower who loves long posts — obviously! — but he lost me for entirely different reasons. He lost me because it’s sadly banal to call someone out for “being a dick” by being an even bigger dick, and maybe also because I’m tired of listening to detached kids in Saucony sneakers trying to debase sincerity as maudlin whimpering. Even Lil Wayne can’t stand that shit.

“Whispery posts” are de rigueur, but I’m gonna call this a “real talk post” because — real talk now — it bothers me that a blogger, of all people, thinks it’s OK to call another blogger that he’s never met a “touchy self-centered prick” over a post that was not nearly as touchy and self-centered and pricky as the response it received. It was like, “Hey, Pot. What do you think of Kettle?”

You’ll notice I’m not posting links to any of the offending posts, and that’s deliberate. I didn’t really sit down to write about a Tumblr feud that doesn’t even involve me because these isolated things blow over and they’re totally unimportant in the Big Picture™. It’s just that reading Pot’s digs at Kettle gave me some pangs of discomfort over the way we talk to each other on the Internet — depersonalizing one another with the artificial separation between “online” and “IRL” — and as someone who has spent most of his adult life trying to write as a means to connect with other human beings, it makes me sad to think that some so-called writers are trying to disconnect and then burn every bridge around them.

It reminded me of that time in 1993, when I was a nineteen-year-old kid with a fanzine, and I decided to trash a band I didn’t really know as a means of entertaining myself. I thought I was being “clever” — which, I guess, is what we called “snark” in the early ’90s. Anyway, the issue had barely come back from the printers before I regretted it. Unlike Pot, it didn’t take long before I realized that my response was way overdetermined, not as clever as I thought it was, and arguably unnecessary. My own Kettles didn’t deserve it.

So I learned my lesson seventeen years ago, and even though I’m admittedly into being the center of attention — you pretty much have to be to do anything in my lines of work — I try to achieve that regularly without being a dick. In his rebuttal post, of course, Pot accuses Kettle of wanting attention, and charitably adds, “I am completely willing to give you attention; I lose nothing by it except the followers who hate long posts.” But this is not totally true: I was a follower who loves long posts — obviously! — but he lost me for entirely different reasons. He lost me because it’s sadly banal to call someone out for “being a dick” by being an even bigger dick, and maybe also because I’m tired of listening to detached kids in Saucony sneakers trying to debase sincerity as maudlin whimpering. Even Lil Wayne can’t stand that shit.

Notes
Navigate
« BACK Page 1 of 55
The Fine Print
NERVOUS ACID is a weblog by NORMAN C. BRANNON. Subscribe by RSS, or find me elsewhere at TWITTER, FLICKR, and LAST FM. Browse THESE LINKS or ASK ME ANYTHING.

All contents © 2004-2010, unless otherwise noted. Published under a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE.